From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 8.3 pending patch queue |
Date: | 2007-01-04 17:24:10 |
Message-ID: | 459D383A.80707@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
> On 1/4/07, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 09:09 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> > That also happens. The only way I can see of ensuring it does not
>> happen
>> > would be to auto-process all patch submissions.
>>
>> Sounds a good idea. Patch farm anyone? Auto apply/make check?
>
> I'm actually trying to simplify something I was working on at OSDL to
> do this. PLM at OSDL was a little to Linux focused. Will let
> everyone know when I have a working prototype.
>
Feel free to discuss design/functionality any time. For example, a
mechanism to feed patches to the buildfarm has previously been
suggested. If this could be done in some automated, controlled and
reasonably safe way it might be useful - it might afford reviewers a
"try before you buy" option. Also, hooking this up with the stuff that
Lukas Smith is doing might be good.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-01-04 17:53:44 | Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-01-04 17:20:32 | ReadyForQuery() |