Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: ReadyForQuery()
Date: 2007-01-04 17:20:32
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
In postgres.c main loop, I note that we issue ReadyForQuery() *after*
updating pgstat and setting the ps display.

Wouldn't it be better to issue ReadyForQuery() and then issue the stat
stuff in the gap between processing? 

That way we would be less likely to care about pgstat and the ps,
potentially getting rid of the GUCs for them completely?

(I'm looking to place a PG_TRACE macro in there, so we can work out how
long is spent waiting for client.)

  Simon Riggs             


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2007-01-04 17:24:10
Subject: Re: 8.3 pending patch queue
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-01-04 17:13:57
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group