Re: effective_cache_size vs units

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size vs units
Date: 2006-12-19 22:39:34
Message-ID: 45886A26.4000607@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> In most cases, I just assume they would just assume
>> they can't use units on it because the default value in the file
>> doesn't have units.
>
> But the default value *does* have units.
>
It does? Didn't in my file. I must've overwritten it with a config file
from some earlier beta (or snapshot) that didn't have it or so - my
default value certainly didn't have it ;-)

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-12-19 22:40:12 Re: Companies Contributing to Open Source
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-12-19 22:37:00 Re: effective_cache_size vs units