Re: effective_cache_size vs units

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size vs units
Date: 2006-12-19 22:43:04
Message-ID: 1166568184.22487.156.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 23:39 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> In most cases, I just assume they would just assume
> >> they can't use units on it because the default value in the file
> >> doesn't have units.
> >
> > But the default value *does* have units.
> >
> It does? Didn't in my file. I must've overwritten it with a config file
> from some earlier beta (or snapshot) that didn't have it or so - my
> default value certainly didn't have it ;-)

Just to confirm, yes the sample I submitted a patch for does have units.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> //Magnus
>
--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brandon Aiken 2006-12-19 22:50:13 Re: Autovacuum Improvements
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-12-19 22:40:12 Re: Companies Contributing to Open Source