| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: some more pg_dump refactoring |
| Date: | 2020-07-15 13:05:32 |
| Message-ID: | 45809a47-3173-344c-93da-8490cd96ac38@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-07-09 16:14, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2020-07-08 06:42, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>>> What do you think about this patch to reorganize the existing code from that
>>> old commit?
>>
>> I think it is a definite further improvement.
>>
>> Patch applies cleanly, compiles, global & pg_dump tap test ok, looks ok to
>> me.
>
> Thanks. I have committed that, and attached is my original patch
> adjusted to this newer style.
committed
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthieu Garrigues | 2020-07-15 13:13:00 | Re: libpq: Request Pipelining/Batching status ? |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2020-07-15 12:54:37 | Which SET TYPE don't actually require a rewrite |