Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL
Date: 2009-09-17 21:44:09
Message-ID: 4572.1253223849@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> writes:
> I don't see any reason why not breaking the user visible behavior of
> tuples CTID between any two major releases,

> Am I completely wet here?

Completely. This is a user-visible behavior that we have encouraged
people to rely on, and for which there is no easy substitute.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-09-17 21:50:07 Re: Fwd: Copy out wording
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-09-17 21:41:01 Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL