Re: SPF Record ...

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SPF Record ...
Date: 2006-11-17 13:35:26
Message-ID: 455DBA9E.5070300@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www


> Since those having @postgresql.org accounts shoudl be limited to these two
> lists, can anyone comment on a) is this a bad idea? and b) would they be
> affected because they don't use SMTP AUTH and c) why aren't you using SMTP
> AUTH? ...
>
>
Are you saying that you don't *require* smtp auth? What about TLS? IMHO
you should be requiring
SMTP+TLS for all servers and users relaying through any @postgresql.org
server.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

> Thx ...
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-11-17 13:37:02 Re: SPF Record ...
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-11-17 13:24:21 Re: SPF Record ...