SPF Record ...

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: SPF Record ...
Date: 2006-11-17 06:05:46
Message-ID: 8FA996C17A9489F3E09AC2A9@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I'm thinking of adding one to DNS, but after reading up on it, I'm a bit
concerned how this might affect some ... specifically, from reading on
openspf.org, anyone that is doing email from their desktop, through their ISP,
instead of using SMTP AUTH to the server itself, may be affected by this ...

I'm not planning on adding SPF to Postfix itself, only to DNS, at this time, so
it won't affect incoming, just outgoing ...

Since those having @postgresql.org accounts shoudl be limited to these two
lists, can anyone comment on a) is this a bad idea? and b) would they be
affected because they don't use SMTP AUTH and c) why aren't you using SMTP
AUTH? ...

Thx ...

- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFXVE64QvfyHIvDvMRAntYAJ9bYnHTqo+1/v0Y2kdG+tB0ZFIL3wCgqZ6k
E2OesE87aAIEVfdsCLulQtk=
=Twi9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2006-11-17 06:15:07 Re: [CORE] SPF Record ...
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-11-17 05:28:15 Re: Two questions about existing sponsors