| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SPF Record ... |
| Date: | 2006-11-17 13:53:12 |
| Message-ID: | C3D61DD6A2606E7CF2224C5E@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, November 17, 2006 05:35:26 -0800 "Joshua D. Drake"
<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Since those having @postgresql.org accounts shoudl be limited to these two
>> lists, can anyone comment on a) is this a bad idea? and b) would they be
>> affected because they don't use SMTP AUTH and c) why aren't you using SMTP
>> AUTH? ...
>>
>>
> Are you saying that you don't *require* smtp auth?
We require SMTP AUTH for anyone wishing to relay through any of our servers,
yes ... we don't run open relays *shiver*
My question above was directed towards ppl like JoshB, whom I know are on the
road and sending email, as to whether they are doing SMTP AUTH against
mail.postgresql.org, or using some other means ...
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFFXb7I4QvfyHIvDvMRAvljAJ93fEGBUN3XmNBCzWDC+2wL9PgGNACeKnqX
annXVuu33RZFHG6l/lDXhkA=
=m82Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-11-17 14:03:00 | Re: SPF Record ... |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2006-11-17 13:50:04 | Re: [CORE] SPF Record ... |