From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Andrey Borodin <amborodin86(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, brad(at)peabody(dot)io, wolakk(at)gmail(dot)com, kydavis(at)cisco(dot)com, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: UUID v7 |
Date: | 2023-02-11 01:18:36 |
Message-ID: | 453139.1676078316@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2023-02-10 15:57:50 -0800, Andrey Borodin wrote:
>> From my POV v7 is especially needed for users. Current standard status
>> is "draft". And I'm not sure it will be accepted before our feature
>> freeze for PG16. Maybe we could provide a draft implementation in 16
>> and adjust it to the accepted version if the standard is changed? PFA
>> patch with implementation.
> Hm. It seems somewhat worrisome to claim something is a v7 UUID when it might
> turn out to not be one.
I think there is no need to rush this into v16. Let's wait for the
standardization process to play out.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2023-02-11 02:00:42 | Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16? |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2023-02-11 01:14:53 | Re: UUID v7 |