Re: UUID v7

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Andrey Borodin <amborodin86(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, brad(at)peabody(dot)io, wolakk(at)gmail(dot)com, kydavis(at)cisco(dot)com, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: UUID v7
Date: 2023-02-11 01:18:36
Message-ID: 453139.1676078316@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2023-02-10 15:57:50 -0800, Andrey Borodin wrote:
>> From my POV v7 is especially needed for users. Current standard status
>> is "draft". And I'm not sure it will be accepted before our feature
>> freeze for PG16. Maybe we could provide a draft implementation in 16
>> and adjust it to the accepted version if the standard is changed? PFA
>> patch with implementation.

> Hm. It seems somewhat worrisome to claim something is a v7 UUID when it might
> turn out to not be one.

I think there is no need to rush this into v16. Let's wait for the
standardization process to play out.

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: UUID v7 at 2023-02-11 01:14:53 from Andres Freund

Responses

  • Re: UUID v7 at 2023-02-11 02:53:25 from Andrey Borodin

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-02-11 02:00:42 Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-02-11 01:14:53 Re: UUID v7