Re: Faster StrNCpy

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Faster StrNCpy
Date: 2006-09-27 13:22:30
Message-ID: 451A7B16.5040702@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>
>>> What I'd like to do immediately is put in strlcpy() and hit the two or
>>> three places I think are performance-relevant.
>>>
>
>
>> Immediately? Presumably you mean for 8.3?
>>
>
> No, I mean now. This is a performance bug and it's still open season on
> bugs. If we were close to having a release-candidate version, I'd hold
> off, but the above proposal seems sufficiently low-risk for the current
> stage of the cycle.
>
>

What are the other hotspots?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2006-09-27 13:40:09 Re: horo(r)logy test fail on solaris (again and solved)
Previous Message Chris Mair 2006-09-27 13:07:28 Re: Please to technical check of upcoming release

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-27 13:49:26 Re: Faster StrNCpy
Previous Message Strong, David 2006-09-27 13:02:46 Re: Faster StrNCpy