Re: Faster StrNCpy

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Faster StrNCpy
Date: 2006-09-27 02:25:48
Message-ID: 2810.1159323948@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> What I'd like to do immediately is put in strlcpy() and hit the two or
>> three places I think are performance-relevant.

> Immediately? Presumably you mean for 8.3?

No, I mean now. This is a performance bug and it's still open season on
bugs. If we were close to having a release-candidate version, I'd hold
off, but the above proposal seems sufficiently low-risk for the current
stage of the cycle.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-09-27 02:27:28 Cross-table statistics idea
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-09-27 00:42:20 Re: Faster StrNCpy

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2006-09-27 07:47:21 Re: Bad bug in fopen() wrapper code
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2006-09-27 00:42:20 Re: Faster StrNCpy