Re: How to use SPI_saveplan

From: Jack Orenstein <jao(at)geophile(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: How to use SPI_saveplan
Date: 2006-09-10 02:45:25
Message-ID: 45037C45.8090405@geophile.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
> Jack Orenstein <jao(at)geophile(dot)com> writes:
>> Assigning SPI_prepare output to a local makes sense. Assigning
>> SPI_saveplan output to a static makes sense. But I don't see
>> the point in assigning SPI_saveplan output to a local, yet
>> that's what one case the doc specifically mentions.
>
> Hm, are you speaking of this?
>
> <para>
> <function>SPI_saveplan</function> saves a passed plan (prepared by
> <function>SPI_prepare</function>) in memory protected from freeing
> by <function>SPI_finish</function> and by the transaction manager
> and returns a pointer to the saved plan. This gives you the
> ability to reuse prepared plans in the subsequent invocations of
> your procedure in the current session. You may save the pointer
> returned in a local variable. Always check if this pointer is
> <symbol>NULL</symbol> or not either when preparing a plan or using
> an already prepared plan in <function>SPI_execute_plan</function>.
> </para>
>
> My inclination is to just delete the last two sentences, on the grounds
> that they are essentially content-free. Perhaps the original author's
> intent would be met by s/local variable/static variable/, but this is
> reference material not beginner hints.

Yes, that's the passage I was referring to. I agree that it would be
clearer with your suggested edit.

Jack Orenstein

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jack Orenstein 2006-09-10 04:12:37 Re: Idle in transaction state.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-09-10 02:44:06 Re: How to use SPI_saveplan