Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews(at)supernews(dot)com> writes:
>
>> Userlock needs to go into core, not get removed; this was discussed in a
>> previous "let's clean up contrib/" thread.
>>
>
> Something like it ought to go into core, but personally I'd opt for
> taking the opportunity to redesign the API, which was a bit crufty to
> begin with. That would eliminate all question of whether the clean room
> was clean enough.
>
>
>
It seems odd to remove the module from contrib for 8.2 and then put a
replacement in core for 8.3. I guess we could signal our intentions in
the release notes.
It's a pity we didn't have Abhijit's patch 6 weeks ago.
cheers
andrew