Re: Ding-dong, contrib is dead ...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: andrew(at)supernews(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Ding-dong, contrib is dead ...
Date: 2006-09-05 14:23:19
Message-ID: 24380.1157466199@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews(at)supernews(dot)com> writes:
> Userlock needs to go into core, not get removed; this was discussed in a
> previous "let's clean up contrib/" thread.

Something like it ought to go into core, but personally I'd opt for
taking the opportunity to redesign the API, which was a bit crufty to
begin with. That would eliminate all question of whether the clean room
was clean enough.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Abhijit Menon-Sen 2006-09-05 14:34:58 Re: Ding-dong, contrib is dead ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-09-05 14:15:14 Re: Ding-dong, contrib is dead ...