Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Subject: Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
Date: 2006-09-04 02:52:45
Message-ID: 44FB94FD.3060004@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Oh, lots of grunt work. I can see that working, but at a high cost.
>
>

I doubt it. Let's just start with bugs, since that's the easy case
anyway. Our real volume is pretty low, so the cost of maintaining it
should not be high. I am assuming we would not be including HEAD, but
only stable branches. With HEAD the volume would be quite a bit higher,
but not impossibly so.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2006-09-04 02:55:03 Re: gBorg status?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-04 02:44:31 Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta