| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Win32 hard crash problem |
| Date: | 2006-08-31 22:47:33 |
| Message-ID: | 44F76705.8080401@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>>> My bet is something depending on GetTickCount to measure elapsed time
>>> (and no, it's not used in the core Postgres code, but you've got plenty
>>> of other possible culprits in that stack).
>
>> This doesn't quite make sense. The only reason we have to reboot is
>> because PostgreSQL no longer responds. The system itself is fine.
>
> The Windows kernel may still work, but that doesn't mean that everything
> Postgres depends on still works. I'm wondering about (a) the TCP stack
> (and that includes 3rd party firewalls and such, not only the core
> Windows code); (b) timing or threading stuff inside the application
> that's using libpq, which the only thing we know about so far is that
> it's *not* JDBC/Hibernate.
/me grumbles in a not so polite way about Windows.
Which means we need to start stripping it down. Gah, I actually argued
*for* this port to. Next time slap me.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-31 22:56:18 | Re: Win32 hard crash problem |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-31 22:39:36 | Re: Win32 hard crash problem |