| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Win32 hard crash problem |
| Date: | 2006-08-31 22:56:18 |
| Message-ID: | 25243.1157064978@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Which means we need to start stripping it down. Gah, I actually argued
> *for* this port to. Next time slap me.
Well, before you invest a lot of time barking up what might be the wrong
tree, there is a very easy test you can use to check the GetTickCount
theory: keep closer track of time-since-boot on the affected systems.
If that idea is right, it won't be "two or three weeks" between boot and
problems appearing, it'll be 24.85 days on the nose. It shouldn't take
much except waiting to either falsify the theory or make it look pretty
convincing.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2006-08-31 23:04:07 | Re: Prepared statements considered harmful |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-08-31 22:47:33 | Re: Win32 hard crash problem |