Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
Date: 2006-08-22 13:14:41
Message-ID: 44EB0341.3060503@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marko Kreen wrote:
> On 8/17/06, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> > Have you tried to use debbugs?
>>
>> If you can find up-to-date source code for debbugs, we might continue
>> that line of thought.
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-debbugs(at)lists(dot)debian(dot)org/msg01266.html
>
> ( bzr get http://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/mainline/ )
>
>> The searching capabilities in debbugs are, well, non-existent, which is
>> a real problem in my mind.
>
> As its mail based, it delegates searching to mail archive search tools.
>

Why are we even dabating a system when it has been reported that the
authors believe it is completely unsuitable for use by the PostgreSQL
project?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-08-22 13:19:13 Re: seahorse again failing
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-08-22 13:10:34 Re: [HACKERS] COPY view