| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting |
| Date: | 2006-08-17 14:21:50 |
| Message-ID: | 44E47B7E.3050606@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>
>>Ever since pgsql-patches replies started going to -hackers, threading
>>doesn't work anymore, so I for one can't tell what this refers to at
>>all.
>
> Yeah, that experiment hasn't seemed to work all that well for me
> either. Do you have another idea to try, or do you just want to revert
> to the old way?
I'd vote for reverting to the old way. Anyone serious about hacking
should be on both lists.
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-08-17 14:37:28 | Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-17 13:20:43 | pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-08-17 14:37:28 | Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-17 13:20:43 | pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors) |