| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting |
| Date: | 2006-08-17 14:37:28 |
| Message-ID: | 20060817143728.GL318@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> >
> >>Ever since pgsql-patches replies started going to -hackers, threading
> >>doesn't work anymore, so I for one can't tell what this refers to at
> >>all.
> >
> >Yeah, that experiment hasn't seemed to work all that well for me
> >either. Do you have another idea to try, or do you just want to revert
> >to the old way?
>
> I'd vote for reverting to the old way. Anyone serious about hacking
> should be on both lists.
+1
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-17 14:38:46 | Re: "cache reference leak" and "problem in alloc set" warnings |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2006-08-17 14:21:50 | Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-08-17 15:08:58 | Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2006-08-17 14:21:50 | Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting |