| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: src/tools/pginclude considered harmful (was Re: [PATCHES] |
| Date: | 2006-07-14 20:37:43 |
| Message-ID: | 44B80097.1080104@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>>I agree with reverting. The tool looks pretty broken anyway, with
>>hardcoded paths and all sorts of stuff quite apart from logic problems.
>>
>>
>
>Well, it's only intended to work on Bruce's system, so until someone
>else takes over the position of chief gruntwork-doer I don't think the
>portability issues are much of a factor.
>
Shouldn't the README reflect that, then?
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-07-14 20:38:56 | Re: src/tools/pginclude considered harmful (was Re: [PATCHES] |
| Previous Message | Zoltan Boszormenyi | 2006-07-14 20:30:41 | Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-07-14 20:38:56 | Re: src/tools/pginclude considered harmful (was Re: [PATCHES] |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-14 20:24:59 | Re: src/tools/pginclude considered harmful (was Re: [PATCHES] |