Re: src/tools/pginclude considered harmful (was Re:

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Subject: Re: src/tools/pginclude considered harmful (was Re:
Date: 2006-07-14 22:03:31
Message-ID: 200607142203.k6EM3Vv15734@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> >
> >
> >>I agree with reverting. The tool looks pretty broken anyway, with
> >>hardcoded paths and all sorts of stuff quite apart from logic problems.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Well, it's only intended to work on Bruce's system, so until someone
> >else takes over the position of chief gruntwork-doer I don't think the
> >portability issues are much of a factor.
> >
>
>
> Shouldn't the README reflect that, then?

The script should work on any computer. I have just never tried it.
Feel free to send in a patch to make it work on yours.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2006-07-14 22:35:12 Re: contrib promotion?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-07-14 22:02:57 Re: src/tools/pginclude considered harmful (was Re:

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Saito 2006-07-14 22:37:01 Re: [PATCHES] c.h is the problem of msvc.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-07-14 22:02:57 Re: src/tools/pginclude considered harmful (was Re: