Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Satoshi Nagayasu <nagayasus(at)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Three weeks left until feature freeze
Date: 2006-07-13 18:40:31
Message-ID: 44B6939F.9030701@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>The right way to proceed is what was mentioned in another message: work
>harder at educating packagers about which non-core projects are worth
>including in their packages. I have to confess contributing to the
>problem, as I'm not currently including eg. Slony in the Red Hat RPMs.
>I certainly should be --- but "fixing" that by pushing Slony into the
>core PG distro is not a solution.
>
>
>

Well, there are other good reasons not to in the slony case.

But anyway, I was wondering if we could make life easier by providing a
script which would fetch some set of addon features, and make building
the whole lot together easy.

No doubt some people will not want to make choices, but I think we need
to, to some extent. I broadly agree with what Martijn has just said,
although I doubt that pgFoundry's Top Downloads section is much of a
guide. If we recommend something we need to be prepared to exerciase
some jusgement and have the courage of our convictions.

Personally, I would start with:

pl/java
pl/ruby
pl/php
jdbc driver
odbc driver
npgsql
python stuff (not sure which, as I don't use it)

The perl and php clients, and libpqxx would also be possibilities.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-07-13 18:43:16 buildfarm future
Previous Message Jonah H. Harris 2006-07-13 18:32:25 Re: Updateable views for 8.2 or 8.3?