Re: WAL Internals question

From: Fabrice Franquenk <Fabrice(dot)Franquenk(at)bull(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WAL Internals question
Date: 2006-07-05 09:29:55
Message-ID: 44AB8693.10700@bull.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

Tom Lane a écrit :
> Fabrice Franquenk <Fabrice(dot)Franquenk(at)bull(dot)net> writes:
>
>> Now i tried to set the bgwriter_lru_percent to 100% and
>> bgwriter_lru_maxpages to 1000 and
>> i did not spot any difference with the disk activities, cpu occupation
>> or anything else from
>>
>
> Hmm, are you sure your changes took effect? To get the bgwriter's
> attention you need to make the change in postgresql.conf and then
> SIGHUP or restart the postmaster. I'd have thought you could easily
> measure a difference given that much change ...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
>
I made sure that all changes in postgresql.conf took effect. I restarted
the postmaster and i could not spot
any difference.
The values of bgwriter_all_percent and bgwriter_all_maxpages are all
default (and i set checkpoints segments value to 250). Could there be
some kind of connection between these parameters and the bgwriter_lru_*
parameters?

by the way, was i correct describing the transaction handling mechanism ?

thanks for your help

regards,
Fabrice Franquenk

In response to

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabrice Franquenk 2006-07-05 09:38:28 Do checkpoints flush all data from shared buffers ?
Previous Message Christoph Della Valle 2006-07-05 06:30:20 Re: copy recursive data