Re: UN FAO Chooses MySQL over Postgres!?!?!

From: Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: UN FAO Chooses MySQL over Postgres!?!?!
Date: 2006-05-02 21:49:17
Message-ID: 4457D3DD.4060307@nedscape.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Yeah, but the Oil for Food Program used Oracle ;-)

Joshua Kramer wrote:
>
> Oh, my.... I wonder how they came to these conclusions!
>
> http://linuxpr.com/releases/8687.html
>
> "With the release of MySQL 5.0 and its new features -- including stored
> procedures, triggers and views -- the reasons why we were looking at
> PostgreSQL no longer existed," continued Vertucci. "MySQL proved to be
> easier to set up, easier to manage and has become a widely-deployed
> standard in the developing countries, helping governments to achieve
> significant costs savings, without sacrificing database speed and power."
>
> Cheers,
> Josh
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-05-02 22:28:20 Re: UN FAO Chooses MySQL over Postgres!?!?!
Previous Message Devrim GUNDUZ 2006-05-02 21:10:52 Re: UN FAO Chooses MySQL over Postgres!?!?!