| From: | Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joshua Kramer <josh(at)bitbuckets(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: UN FAO Chooses MySQL over Postgres!?!?! |
| Date: | 2006-05-02 21:10:52 |
| Message-ID: | 1146604252.2471.14.camel@laptop.gunduz.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 15:39 -0400, Joshua Kramer wrote:
> "With the release of MySQL 5.0 and its new features -- including
> stored procedures, triggers and views -
PostgreSQL has all of them for years, they are well tested and advanced
features. I would not use MySQL just because of new features...
Anyway, as people stated out, this seems a MySQL's press release.
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ned Lilly | 2006-05-02 21:49:17 | Re: UN FAO Chooses MySQL over Postgres!?!?! |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-05-02 20:30:36 | Re: UN FAO Chooses MySQL over Postgres!?!?! |