| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove Jan Wieck's name from copyrights, |
| Date: | 2006-03-10 01:11:31 |
| Message-ID: | 4410D243.4040104@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
> Seeing that now you're working for a company that depends on the ability
> to redistribute the PG code commercially, I would think you'd be all for
> making sure that the legalities are nicely lined up. Do you really want
> to dig through the source tree at every release to see whether you can
> redistribute all of it?
>
I am not sure, but I think that Alvaro's point is the copyright
doesn't matter in this instance. It is the license that does.
I can't read Alvaro's mind though :).
It is very good to keep everything consistent.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-10 01:16:10 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove Jan Wieck's name from copyrights, and put in standard |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-10 01:01:00 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove Jan Wieck's name from copyrights, and put in standard |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-10 01:16:10 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove Jan Wieck's name from copyrights, and put in standard |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-10 01:01:00 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove Jan Wieck's name from copyrights, and put in standard |