From: | Rolf Schaufelberger <rs(at)plusw(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-de-allgemein(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de> |
Subject: | Postgres in der OpenSource-Directory |
Date: | 2009-06-23 10:39:20 |
Message-ID: | 440F12D6-CEEA-423F-B284-F5B00CF3FB3D@plusw.de |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-de-allgemein |
Hallo,
diese Woche war bei heise ein Artikel über ein OpenSource-Directory:
Darin werden auch versch. Datenbanken bewertet und MySQL erhält da 5
Sterne , PostgreSQL nur 4.
Ich habe die dann angeschrieben, dass ich diese Sicht nicht Teile,
die Antwort möchte ich euch nicht vorenthalten:
> the "enterprise readiness rating" is not a purely "technical"
> assessment.
> I would agree that from a pure technical point both, MySQL and
> PostgreSQL, are peers. And that is also what you find in the
> "functionality", "maturity" and "community" ratings.
> However, for an Enterprise, professional support, migrations tools,
> spread/distribution/market presence and available expertise in the
> market are important too. And this is where MySQL at least
> historically has outperformed PostgreSQL to some extent. This also
> explains why there's a niche for EnterpriseDB to position its
> professional services and product offerings.
> This is why we came up with one additional "star" for MySQL. It's
> debatable, I agree. And we probably should think of upgrading
> PostgreSQL.
>
> Thank you for your feedback and input.
Grüße
Rolf Schaufelberger
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Albe Laurenz | 2009-06-24 09:10:27 | Re: Postgres in der OpenSource-Directory |
Previous Message | Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum | 2009-06-22 11:53:05 | == Wöchentlicher PostgreSQL Newsletter - 21. Juni 2009 == |