Re: [PATCH] Compressed TOAST data corruption with REPACK CONCURRENTLY

From: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Compressed TOAST data corruption with REPACK CONCURRENTLY
Date: 2026-04-20 11:40:20
Message-ID: 44015.1776685220@localhost
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 10:40:39AM -0700, SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM wrote:
> > I started with that but tried to follow the existing code pattern. This
> > LGTM.
> > Please add a comment as well.
>
> Hmm. I was reading restore_tuple(), and could it make sense to expand
> a bit more the tests so as more types of varlena pointers could be
> checked in this routine? I am taking about MAIN, EXTENDED and
> EXTERNAL, so as we could check more patterns with in-line
> [non-]compressed, and external [non-]compressed, counting for the four
> different possible patterns that could lead to repacked data. See for
> example strings.sql for such tests, that could be used as base
> inspiration.

ok, this is a patch to enhance the tests. It also simplifies
gen_compressible() a bit and adjusts it so it is (hopefully) more reliable in
generating compressible values. Now it can be used to reproduce the fix [1].

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/52301.1776440752%40localhost

--
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Enhance-tests-for-TOAST-processing-by-REPACK.patch text/x-diff 5.2 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2026-04-20 11:45:35 Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2026-04-20 11:15:36 Re: First draft of PG 19 release notes