Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption
Date: 2005-12-19 13:10:13
Message-ID: 43A6B135.7060209@pse-consulting.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:

>
> So it's only an issue if you have a policy of removing old versions of
> libpq on upgrades... I'm not sure what's "best practice" on windows in
> this area.

When removing the application (in this case: pgsql), you'd remove that
old lib as well if it's the only app using it. If you have another
application installed, the deinstaller should observe this, and keep the
version.

I'm voting +1 for lib name versions.

Regards,
Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2005-12-19 13:25:24 Re: Does VACUUM reorder tables on clustered indices
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-12-19 12:48:20 Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption