| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Does VACUUM reorder tables on clustered indices |
| Date: | 2005-12-19 13:25:24 |
| Message-ID: | 20051219132524.GA6777@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 10:08:22PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Just for the record, that behavior is seriously broken: it violates
> MVCC if any of the deleted tuples are still visible to anyone else.
Does it remove tuples that VACUUM FULL wouldn't? I always thought it
did essentially the same thing?
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what
you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now.
--J.D. Baldwin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2005-12-19 14:12:50 | Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption |
| Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-12-19 13:10:13 | Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Client-side password encryption |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lane Van Ingen | 2005-12-19 13:46:39 | Re: How to Force Transactions to Process Serially on A Table |
| Previous Message | Lane Van Ingen | 2005-12-19 13:07:20 | How to Force Transactions to Process Serially on A Table |