Re: pgstat_report_activity() and parallel CREATE INDEX (was: Parallel index creation & pg_stat_activity)

Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 08:39:35AM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> I also prefer 2.

> Thanks. Here is the pair of patches I plan to use. The second is equivalent
> to v0; I just added a log message.

The change in worker_spi_main seems a little weird/lazy. I'd
be inclined to set and clear debug_query_string each time through
the loop, so that those operations are adjacent to the other
status-reporting operations, as they are in initialize_worker_spi.

I don't really like modifying a StringInfo while debug_query_string
is pointing at it, either. Yeah, you'll *probably* get away with
that because the buffer is unlikely to move, but since the whole
exercise can only benefit crash-debugging scenarios, it'd be better
to be more paranoid.

One idea is to set debug_query_string immediately before each SPI_execute
and clear it just afterwards, rather than trying to associate it with
pgstat_report_activity calls.

regards, tom lane