| From: | "C(dot) Filipe Medeiros" <filipe(at)mercenary3(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: First Step to Major Use: Integrated Full-Text |
| Date: | 2005-12-06 01:41:44 |
| Message-ID: | 4394EC58.3020309@mercenary3.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
>> E.g; if you are using full text with MySQL, you are using a bum
backend destined to loose data.
>> Although I agree with your arguments for integration, I should point
out that MySQL's full text indexing and it's transactions are mutually
exclusive. You can't have both.
All the more reason to trump it, no? I am curious though. Let's say that
eventually we come to a conclusion regarding Postgres, what steps does
one take to get something like this implemented?
- Filipe
P.S., if this were implemented, I would be behind an organized
Postgresql adoption campaign. Once it has this, in my book, it has most
of what it needs for most license-distributed web apps.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-12-06 01:49:58 | Re: First Step to Major Use: Integrated Full-Text |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-12-06 01:38:00 | Re: First Step to Major Use: Integrated Full-Text |