Re: First Step to Major Use: Integrated Full-Text

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "C(dot) Filipe Medeiros" <filipe(at)mercenary3(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: First Step to Major Use: Integrated Full-Text
Date: 2005-12-06 01:38:00
Message-ID: 4394EB78.1070405@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

>
> Although I agree with your arguments for integration, I should point
> out that MySQL's full text indexing and it's transactions are mutually
> exclusive. You can't have both.
E.g; if you are using full text with MySQL, you are using a bum backend
destined to loose data.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> Chris
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message C. Filipe Medeiros 2005-12-06 01:41:44 Re: First Step to Major Use: Integrated Full-Text
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-12-06 01:36:50 Re: First Step to Major Use: Integrated Full-Text