Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Vladimir Borodin <root(at)simply(dot)name>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order?
Date: 2018-02-01 14:09:34
Message-ID: 42ba95b7-40ff-984e-27ac-6df6feb80f42@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/31/18 11:48, Vladimir Borodin wrote:
> Will it work only for a particular database? Or for a whole cluster
> during initdb also? Any chance to get this done in 11?

I'm currently not working on it.

It's basically just a lot of leg work, and you need to come up with a
catalog representation. Possible options have already been addressed in
earlier threads.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-02-01 14:29:09 Re: [HACKERS] generated columns
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-02-01 14:04:57 Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use