Re: Postgres 10.1 fails to start: server did not start in time

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres 10.1 fails to start: server did not start in time
Date: 2017-11-10 21:20:28
Message-ID: 42b1d9dc-29d6-6408-298b-42b2b77d8666@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 11/10/2017 01:01 PM, Adam Brusselback wrote:
>> You might want to increase pg_ctl's wait timeout for this situation,
>> since the default's evidently too little. However ...
> Got it, thanks.
>
>> ... pg_ctl itself wouldn't decide to forcibly shut down the server
>> if the timeout expired. It merely stops waiting and tells you so.
>> It seems like this must represent misdesign of whatever start script
>> you're using. I think you need to complain to the Debian packagers
>> about that.
>
> Hmm, interesting. I installed from this repo:
> http://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt/ stretch-pgdg main
>
> I was assuming someone in the Postgres project was involved in
> packaging it. Do you know who I should reach out to in that case?

I'm pretty sure Christoph Berg is at least involved. I cc'd him here in
case he misses this thread.

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-11-10 21:29:17 Re: Postgres 10.1 fails to start: server did not start in time
Previous Message Adam Brusselback 2017-11-10 21:01:12 Re: Postgres 10.1 fails to start: server did not start in time