Re: Postgres 10.1 fails to start: server did not start in time

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres 10.1 fails to start: server did not start in time
Date: 2017-11-10 21:29:17
Message-ID: 10500.1510349357@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> You might want to increase pg_ctl's wait timeout for this situation,
>> since the default's evidently too little. However ...

> Got it, thanks.

>> ... pg_ctl itself wouldn't decide to forcibly shut down the server
>> if the timeout expired. It merely stops waiting and tells you so.
>> It seems like this must represent misdesign of whatever start script
>> you're using. I think you need to complain to the Debian packagers
>> about that.

> Hmm, interesting. I installed from this repo:
> http://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt/ stretch-pgdg main
> I was assuming someone in the Postgres project was involved in
> packaging it. Do you know who I should reach out to in that case?

Christoph's probably a good place to start.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message DrakoRod 2017-11-10 23:48:25 Re: Because PostgreSQL is compiling in old versions of OS?
Previous Message Joe Conway 2017-11-10 21:20:28 Re: Postgres 10.1 fails to start: server did not start in time