Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method
Date: 2005-08-08 22:22:14
Message-ID: 42F7DB16.2000008@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


>>>I think we should offer the reliable option by default, and mention the
>>>fast option for those who have battery-backed cache in the manual.
>>
>>But only on Win32?
>
>
> Yes, because that's the only place where that option works, right?

fsync_writethrough only works on Win32 the postgresql.conf should
reflect that.

>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Kreen 2005-08-08 22:25:31 Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-08-08 22:15:51 Re: #escape_string_warning = off