| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee> |
| Subject: | Re: #escape_string_warning = off |
| Date: | 2005-08-08 22:15:51 |
| Message-ID: | 42F7D997.3070203@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
>>Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>
>>>The correct lingo would be standard_conforming_strings. I'm going to change
>>>that.
>
>
>>Sounds good.
>
>
> No problem here either.
>
So does that mean for 8.1 it will be:
standard_conforming_strings = on/off
?
>
>>Another question is whether this should be backpatched to
>>our next 7.4.X or 8.0.X release as read-only variables.
>
>
> Unnecessary; any client code written to use this need only assume that
> absence of the parameter means the old behavior.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-08-08 22:22:14 | Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-08-08 22:14:32 | Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method |