Re: Autotools update

From: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Autotools update
Date: 2005-07-03 01:03:55
Message-ID: 42C7397B.9090905@paradise.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Does the FreeBSD one actually produce different output? I don't
> remember seeing any of that and I am not running FreeBSD.
>

On my 5.4 system autoconf259 and gnu-autoconf both fetch the *same* src
file (autoconf-2.59.tar.bz2 with md5sum 1ee40f7a676b3cfdc0e3f7cd81551b5f).

The autoconf259 package applys some FreeBSD specific patches - they seem
to be mainly about ensuring the package calls itself 'autoconf259'
instead of plain old 'autoconf', plus a permission change for auxiliary
directories.

(I have attached the 4 patches...)

Mark

Attachment Content-Type Size
autoconf259-patches.tar.gz application/gzip 1.1 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-07-03 02:16:17 Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-07-03 00:32:50 Re: Autotools update