Re: Autotools update

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Autotools update
Date: 2005-07-02 18:56:27
Message-ID: 200507021856.j62IuRM28678@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > 'k, just checked, and we have the FreeBSD one installed, and always
> > have used in the in the past ... I can install the gnu-* one if you
> > think it will make a difference though, but I don't believe we've had
> > any problem reports on any of our past releases ... ?
>
> I think it is the general understanding that we use GNU Autoconf, not
> FreeBSD Autoconf, so the former is the one that should get used. Also,
> when the next person who is not using FreeBSD checks in a configure
> update, we get useless diffs and divergences that we could happily do
> without.

Does the FreeBSD one actually produce different output? I don't
remember seeing any of that and I am not running FreeBSD.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-07-02 19:46:19 Re: Autotools update
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-07-02 18:53:01 Re: Autotools update