Re: lastval()

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: lastval()
Date: 2005-06-05 12:01:31
Message-ID: 42A2E99B.3030409@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> Anyway, let me take a look at it in a minute. My main comment is that it's
> not the code that's the main thing to fix but to decide is if we want the
> feature at all.

I want the feature. Is useful for PHP ...

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Havasvölgyi Ottó 2005-06-05 13:14:19 Re: PGDN source browser
Previous Message Tom Flavel 2005-06-05 11:19:17 Re: PGDN source browser

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Hansen 2005-06-05 12:08:25 Re: lastval()
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2005-06-05 10:09:08 Re: pg_starttime()