| From: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jharris(at)tvi(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Douglas McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: soundex and metaphone |
| Date: | 2005-05-26 13:07:34 |
| Message-ID: | 4295CA16.2020608@tvi.edu |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At a minimum I think we should support soundex in the core. I'm willing
to move soundex and metaphone into the backend. Does anyone see a
reason not to do so?
Douglas McNaught wrote:
>"Jonah H. Harris" <jharris(at)tvi(dot)edu> writes:
>
>
>
>>Hey everyone,
>>
>>I've been working with a couple people who didn't know that soundex
>>and metaphone were included in the distribution as contrib modules.
>>While it's their fault that they didn't check contrib, soundex is
>>pretty common among database systems and I was wondering if there was
>>a reason it is not included as a core function?
>>
>>
>
>Because no one's taken ownership of the code and made a case for
>integrating it into the core backend.
>
>-Doug
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2005-05-26 13:28:34 | Re: foreign keys and RI triggers |
| Previous Message | Narasimha.Sridhar | 2005-05-26 10:08:33 | Rod Taylor |