Re: soundex and metaphone

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jharris(at)tvi(dot)edu>
To: Douglas McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: soundex and metaphone
Date: 2005-05-26 13:07:34
Message-ID: 4295CA16.2020608@tvi.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At a minimum I think we should support soundex in the core. I'm willing
to move soundex and metaphone into the backend. Does anyone see a
reason not to do so?

Douglas McNaught wrote:

>"Jonah H. Harris" <jharris(at)tvi(dot)edu> writes:
>
>
>
>>Hey everyone,
>>
>>I've been working with a couple people who didn't know that soundex
>>and metaphone were included in the distribution as contrib modules.
>>While it's their fault that they didn't check contrib, soundex is
>>pretty common among database systems and I was wondering if there was
>>a reason it is not included as a core function?
>>
>>
>
>Because no one's taken ownership of the code and made a case for
>integrating it into the core backend.
>
>-Doug
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2005-05-26 13:28:34 Re: foreign keys and RI triggers
Previous Message Narasimha.Sridhar 2005-05-26 10:08:33 Rod Taylor