Re: Why do we have perl and sed versions of Gen_dummy_probes?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Why do we have perl and sed versions of Gen_dummy_probes?
Date: 2021-05-07 17:04:25
Message-ID: 42844.1620407065@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Here's a patch that adds the README and also adds a Makefile recipe for
> regenerating Gen_dummy_probes.pl after the sed script is changed. On my
> system at least the recipe is idempotent.

I've not tested the Makefile recipe, but the README looks good.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-05-07 17:18:19 Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-05-07 17:00:08 Re: Draft back-branch release notes are up