| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Draft back-branch release notes are up |
| Date: | 2021-05-07 17:00:08 |
| Message-ID: | 42640.1620406808@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I see similar (if not duplicate) entries for a "COMMIT AND CHAIN"
> issue, committed at nearly the same time, and both by Fujii Masao. Are
> these the same / should they be contained in one entry?
>> +Author: Fujii Masao <fujii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
>> +Branch: master [8a55cb5ba] 2021-02-19 21:57:52 +0900
>> +Author: Fujii Masao <fujii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
>> +Branch: master [fe06819f1] 2021-02-19 22:01:25 +0900
No, the first is a server bug, the second is a psql bug.
Thanks for looking though!
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-05-07 17:04:25 | Re: Why do we have perl and sed versions of Gen_dummy_probes? |
| Previous Message | Matthias van de Meent | 2021-05-07 16:43:54 | Re: Draft back-branch release notes are up |