Re: Very worried about this

From: Kris Kiger <kris(at)musicrebellion(dot)com>
To: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
Cc: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>, "Pgsql-Admin (E-mail)" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Very worried about this
Date: 2005-03-24 22:01:21
Message-ID: 424338B1.9050501@musicrebellion.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Heh, I see. The sequence currval was set lower than what was already in
the table. It just so happened we had holes in our data for the values
it was selecting. Thanks for pointing that out!

Kris

Michael Fuhr wrote:

>On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 04:45:02PM -0500, Kris Kiger wrote:
>
>
>
>>I'm positive no one else has been in the database. There are two of us
>>who work on it and we have been side by side all afternoon. The problem
>>appears to be purely internal to the database. I'm running more tests
>>as we speak and we are still recieving the same sporadic errors. It
>>works for a long amount of time and then the error occurs, but then
>>things work fine again for a while. The inconsistency is quite troubling.
>>
>>
>
>What are the results of the following queries?
>
>SELECT max(d_id) FROM hd;
>SELECT * FROM hd_d_id_seq;
>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Moran.Michael 2005-03-25 01:31:56 Calling Functions from Delete Rules (+ contrib/pgcrypto) = madnes s?
Previous Message Steve Crawford 2005-03-24 22:00:44 Re: Very worried about this