Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Where are we on stored procedures?

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Where are we on stored procedures?
Date: 2005-02-25 06:48:16
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-jdbc
Tom Lane wrote:
> Essentially I'm thinking about the JDBC solution, but automated a bit
> better.

So would your proposal invent a new "stored procedure" construct, or 
just add some sugar to the existing function stuff? i.e. will you be 
able to issue a CREATE FUNCTION that specifies OUT parameters?

> This doesn't address the question of SETOF results, of course.  I'm
> leaning towards returning those as cursors.

This is part of the reason I liked the approach of introduced SQL-level 
variables. Besides being a feature that has some use in itself, it could 
be extended reasonably cleanly to allow (effectively) SETOF variables 
and rowtype variables.

> Well, I think that when people ask us for "stored procedures", most of
> them mean that they want transaction control.

Yes, that is certainly what Gavin and I spent most of our time banging 
our heads against the wall on :(

> But if you can pass over what you have, I'd like to see about
> pressing forward.

Sure, I've attached a very WIP patch with the utility command 
definitions; unfortunately I don't think it will be of much use, as much 
of it is CREATE PROCEDURE-related boilerplate. Gavin will update the 
matching-arguments-by-name code to HEAD at some point in the future; I 
believe that works fine for functions (since we just error out in case 
of ambiguity), so we can include it in 8.1 independently on any other 
work on SPs.


Attachment: spdevel-2.patch.gz
Description: application/gzip (20.2 KB)

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2005-02-25 07:02:45
Subject: Re: UTF8 or Unicode
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2005-02-25 06:47:39
Subject: Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Kovács PéterDate: 2005-02-25 13:27:49
Subject: Statement level transactions
Previous:From: NicoDate: 2005-02-25 02:00:15
Subject: rule/trigger for batch update

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group