Re: UTF8 or Unicode

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk, oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com, zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: UTF8 or Unicode
Date: 2005-02-25 07:02:45
Message-ID: 200502250802.46702.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> We are not consistent in favoring the
> official names vs. the common names.

The problem is rather that there are too many standards and conventions
to choose from.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-02-25 07:07:07 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32
Previous Message Neil Conway 2005-02-25 06:48:16 Re: Where are we on stored procedures?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karel Zak 2005-02-25 08:59:25 Re: UTF8 or Unicode
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-02-25 05:27:58 Re: [PATCHES] A way to let Vacuum warn if FSM settings are low.